Search for: "SEE, Inc. v. See Concept SAS" Results 41 - 58 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Inc.,[8] which had different facts to the case in point, and also emphasized the decision in Evans v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
  I decided to revisit the syllabus to see if I could make better sense of the course for students--that is to make it more relevant to the experience and expectations of students while providing significant and coherent value added to the law school education experience. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 12:21 pm by Jeff Neuburger
The court did not mention the recent ruling of the European Court of Justice in SAS Institute Inc. v World Programming Ltd. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 12:21 pm by Jeff Neuburger
The court did not mention the recent ruling of the European Court of Justice in SAS Institute Inc. v World Programming Ltd. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 8:15 am by Sean Wajert
But a plurality rejected the "stream of commerce" concept in Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm by Martin George
This control shall take place when arbitral awards are challenged in the Member State of origin or when arbitral awards are recognised in other EU Member States.18 Unsurprisingly, the different concepts underlying litigation and arbitration entail diverging results in similar constellations. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Report and Blog)   Global - Patents New exchange, Intellectual Property Exchange International, can be a game-changer, but will need good patents to thrive (IAM) (Technology Transfer Tactics)   Australia Bittersweet decision for Mars but Cadbury settles purple dispute: Mars Australia Pty Ltd v Sweet Rewards Pty Ltd (Managing IP) (ipwars)   Belgium Belgian Supreme Court prohibits fishing expeditions: Ineos Manufacturing Belgium NV and Ineos… [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:02 am
By saying those concepts were not to be applied "more generally", he only meant that they could not properly be applied so generally as to find that the shape of Kenwood's mixer was so close to that of the mark as to infringe under Article 9(1)(c) -- not that they were to be applied less generally where the mark and the sign were both product shapes. * the facts here were a long way away from those considered by the Court of Appeal in L'Oreal SA v… [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Ill. 1977): Magnavox argued that defendants had infringed on its patent & concept of electronic ping-pong with their Pong-like games.The Magnavox Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
– Address to Joint Session of Congress 24 Feb (Securing Innovation) (Securing Innovation)   US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court rejects Federal Trade Commission’s bid to revive battle with Rambus (Law360) (ContentAgenda) (Hal Wegner) Supreme Court declines petition to review Singleton v Volkswagon regarding transfer of venue under 28 USC §1404(a) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Affidavit evidence to rebut KSR obviousness: Pivonka… [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Copyright protection expiration in China: lifetime plus fifty (IP Dragon) EU experience and practice must show China the way concerning IPR protection at exhibitions (IP Dragon) Comparison between IPR in China relevant provisions of Foreign Trade Law 2004 and 1994 (IP Dragon) Thesis and publications about IPR in China (IP Dragon) 2009: New trends in China’s judicial protection of intellectual property rights (China Law Insight) Best practices in technology transfer and IP licensing in… [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 7:45 am
Raleigh, NC 27673 Phone: (919) 733-9250; (V/TTY); (800) 821-6922 (V/TTY/Toll Free in NC only) Fax: (919) 733-9173 Pathways to the Future, Inc. 525 Mineral Springs Drive Sylva, NC 28779 Phone: (828) 631-1167(V/TTY) Fax: (828) 631-1169 E-mail: pathways@main.nc.us State ADA Coordinator Larry Jones NC Office on the ADA 217 West Jones Street Raleigh, NC 27603-1336 Phone: (919) 715-2302 (V/TTY) E-mail: Larry.Jones@ncmail.net Web:… [read post]