Search for: "SELLERS v. WYETH"
Results 41 - 60
of 66
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
Wyeth, Pet., Nos. 600 & 610 EAL 2010:The issues in No. 600 EAL 2010, as stated by petitioner/appellant Wyeth are: (1) Whether the Superior Court erred in creating a new claim for negligent design defect of a prescription drug, despite Plaintiff-Respondent Patsy Lance's repeated waiver of that claim? [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 2:02 pm
Wyeth, both the plaintiff and the defendant had sought Pa. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:24 pm
Wyeth v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
Wyeth, 876 N.E.2d 740, 756 (Ill. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 4:42 am
White v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 6:00 am
Wyeth, No. 35296, Slip Op. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 1:08 pm
Wyeth, No. 35296, slip op. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:56 pm
" Legg v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 12:54 pm
Wyeth, Inc., 2006 WL 2883030, at *4 (W.D. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:44 am
Even under Wyeth v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:59 am
Wyeth, 2010 Pa. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:37 pm
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 385 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2004); White v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 7:27 am
Garcia v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:23 pm
That started on the very first page, where the court, quoted Perez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 7:04 am
Wyeth v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:51 pm
Wyeth. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 10:10 pm
Instead, the court held that the issue was controlled by the Supreme Court's recent decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
Herrmann represents Wyeth (which won't be just Wyeth much longer) in a lot of things. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
Given the size of the overdose, no alleged illegibility of the little lines on the cup could possibly have made the slightest difference in the result.What's going on in those cases is the same thing we've already commented about in the context of the big preemption cases, Wyeth v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
Wyeth, 894 A.2d 141, 145, 149-50 (Pa. [read post]
