Search for: "SENAT V. STATE" Results 41 - 60 of 11,552
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 9:31 pm by Steven Calabresi
Washington, D.C. super-lawyer, Gene Schaerr, has filed an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:30 am by Terry Hart
” Connecticut AG Members Oppose State Ebook Licensing Bill — “On April 19, 2024, more than 60 Authors Guild members from the state of Connecticut sent a letter to leaders in both houses of the Connecticut General Assembly voicing their concerns about Senate Bill 148 and House Bill 5312. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:38 am by Chukwuma Okoli
It approved the US approach (Hilton v Guyot) to the effect that: ‘The application of the doctrine of comity means that the recognition of foreign decisions is not out of obligation, but rather out of convenience and utility’ [para 59]. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
[V]iolent protest is not protected; peaceful protest is. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:05 pm by Brian Connor
District Court for the District of Oregon to dismiss Juliana v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:21 pm by JURIST Staff
The Arizona State House took up and passed the bill to repeal the ban, HB2677, two weeks following the state Supreme Court’s ruling, sending the bill to the State Senate. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm by Reference Staff
Seattle Municipal Archives / CC BY 2.0 DEEDFollowing the release of the report the United States Senate passed an amended version of the Civil Rights Act that included the fair housing provisions. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am by INFORRM
United States As mentioned above, the US Senate has voted in favour of legislation that could ban TikTok in the country if its Chinese owners refuse to sell. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:29 pm by Stuart Kaplow
(Yes the budget was adopted by Senate Bill 360, but the available version does Not include the Conference Committee amendments.) [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm by Marty Lederman
 Moreover, at least three important precedents--United States v. [read post]