Search for: "SHAPIRO v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 41 - 60
of 221
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2022, 11:10 am
Reynolds traced the influence of the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 11:33 am
” The troops are expected to depart within the next few days. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 2:29 pm
Justice Department (DOJ)—sets forth 91 sets of questions (subsumed under 15 headings) that provide ample opportunity for public comment on a large range of topics. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
Quoted in How the Biden Justice Department is Untangling the Legal Fights it Inherited From Trump, National Law Journal (Feb. 26, 2021) (Also available here). [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 7:58 am
It may be a first for our podcast to reference Marbury v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 5:06 pm
It may be a first for our podcast to reference Marbury v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 5:06 pm
It may be a first for our podcast to reference Marbury v. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 9:39 pm
Details are scant: The Justice Department is expected to pursue an argument that the Texas law illegally interferes with federal interests, one of the people said. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 10:43 am
On July 30, 2021, the Department of Justice announced that it was intervening in the Kaiser Permanente case, along with five other parallel cases. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 8:48 am
Singh v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 5:57 am
Federal Election Commission and Shelby County v. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm
Shapiro, Big Fire Law & Policy Group; Jessica A. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
Quoted on The Ben Shapiro Show about impeachment (Jan. 23, 2020). [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 11:48 am
One of the most important Supreme Court decisions protecting the right to travel is Shapiro v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 9:43 am
One of the most important Supreme Court decisions protecting the right to travel is Shapiro v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm
On the other hand, China’s system also needs the local governments and their public health departments to respond as fast as possible. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 6:16 pm
Yet the lower courts (and the Department of Justice) have acquiesced to their standing claims. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 5:00 am
Briggs and City of Chicago v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm
As witness Gary Shapiro suggested, imposing overly “prescriptive” requirements that are not based on a proper cost-benefit analysis might unintentionally harm innovation or delay the development of a product that requires a different approach. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:32 am
Shapiro: The most obvious example is National Federation of Independent Businesses v. [read post]
