Search for: "SHARPE v. EPA "
Results 41 - 57
of 57
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2012, 4:10 am
” Amchem Products, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:55 pm
The case, Sackett v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:02 pm
Furthermore, manufacturers will see their bottom line affected by a sharp increase in energy costs. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:05 am
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 1:18 pm
Thus we do not see any sharp disconnect between the process given a citizen and the likely penalty that can be imposed under the CWA. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:34 am
EPA opinion. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 6:32 pm
EPA opinion. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 10:08 am
EPA is faithfully following the Clean Air Act and the Supreme Court’s landmark 2007 global warming decision, Massachusetts v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Mar. 26, 2009)Affirming dismissal of fem manager's sex/discharge suitDC CircuitDouglas v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (IP finance), Technical assistance a key point of discussion at TRIPS Council: (Intellectual Property Watch), WIPO turmoil as new DG’s future comes under threat: (IAM), WIPO to host inter-regional forum to explore strategies to enhance development and service-orientation of IP offices: (WIPO), Controversy over lack of transparency and overreaching enforcement provisions in ACTA: (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands World anti-counterfeiting day:… [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 12:42 am
EPA case. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:45 am
Medtronic and Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 11:56 pm
The suit accused the federal EPA of dragging its feet on California's nearly two-year-old request for a waiver that would allow the state to mandate a 30 percent reduction in global warming emissions from vehicles by 2016. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 1:32 pm
The Supreme Court briefing is now complete in Riegel v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 7:05 am
The antidegradation application and addendum plus the draft permit and fact sheet were sent to EPA Region V on January 9, 2007 for their review prior to sending a pre-public notice draft permit to BP. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 4:49 pm
Environmental Protection Agency is a sharp rebuke to the Bush administration, which argued that such gases are not air pollutants under the meaning of the Clean Air Act. [read post]
