Search for: "SHELBY COUNTY ELECTIONS COMMISSION" Results 41 - 60 of 98
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2018, 7:05 am by David Pozen
Sebelius and the principle of “equal sovereignty” among states in Shelby County v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Colorado Civil Rights Commission ruling by relying on the parts of the opinion discussing the expression inherent in certain facets of a wedding to confer conscience-based exemptions from anti-discrimination laws for individuals and small businesses that don’t want to provide goods and services to gay/lesbian nuptial celebrations.Affirmative ActionJustice Kennedy’s vote had been with the conservative bloc in virtually every affirmative action case over the past two decades,… [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 8:52 am by Edward Foley
Similarly, Kennedy’s crucial fifth vote for the 2013 majority opinion in Shelby County v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am by Andrew Hamm
In Marbury, Marshall made several ingenious Machiavellian moves: (1) He did not recuse himself: Marshall, the Supreme Court jurist, judged a case involving his actions as President John Adams’ secretary of state when he commissioned William Marbury as a justice of the peace, a commission that Marshall’s brother James failed to deliver on time. (2) He stacked the deck by prioritizing the issues in the case: Marshall left the procedural issue of subject-matter… [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 4:31 am by NCC Staff
He represented Shelby County, AL in the Shelby County case. [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
Davis, in which the court lifted the death sentence of a Texas inmate whose defense expert had testified during sentencing that the defendant was more likely to be violent in the future because he is black, noting that “the Roberts of 2017 in Buck seems to have a keener appreciation of racism than the Roberts of four years earlier in Shelby County” and wondering “whether the 2016 election and its thinly-veiled racism challenged him to… [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:26 am by Kate Howard
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP 16-833 Issues: (1) Whether a federal court has the authority to re-impose, under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the same “anti-retrogression” preclearance standard invalidated as to Section 5 by Shelby County v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am by John Elwood
The San Diego County Sheriff, however, defines “good cause” to require a showing of a particularized need for self-defense. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am by John Elwood
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, 16-111 Issue: Whether applying Colorado’s public accommodations law to compel the petitioner to create expression that violates his sincerely held religious beliefs about marriage violates the free speech or free exercise clause of the First Amendment. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 7:59 am by Kate Howard
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP 16-833 Issues: (1) Whether a federal court has the authority to reimpose, under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the same “anti-retrogression” preclearance standard invalidated as to Section 5 by Shelby County v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by John Elwood
You will recall that a few years back in Shelby County v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:45 am by Kate Howard
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP 16-833 Issues: (1) Whether a federal court has the authority to reimpose, under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the same “anti-retrogression” preclearance standard invalidated as to Section 5 by Shelby County v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Like other factual findings in the trial court, the Supreme Court defers to these findings as to predominant motive.Finally, the fact that relevant portions of the Voting Rights Act on which the Arizona districting commission relied have since been held unconstitutional in Shelby County v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:23 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
On October 16, 2012, a complaint was filed in Shelby County Circuit Court for health care liability, intentional medical battery, and punitive damages. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:21 am by Amy Howe
   The Court didn’t issue its decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 1:57 pm by Amy Howe
” The commission counters that the Court’s Shelby County ruling should not change the result in this case. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The complication here is that the VRA’s requirements with which the Arizona commission seems to have, in good faith, been trying to comply have since been deemed by the Supreme Court (in the Shelby County, Alabama v. [read post]