Search for: "SHORT v. USA"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,020
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2023, 7:04 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm
Anything short of that was regarded as a professional failure. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:12 am
In short, Ms. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 8:24 am
Scott v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 7:04 am
The DPC observed that parties “falling within the definition of an electronic communications service provider [“ECS”] subject to the FISA 702 PRISM programme may equally fall foul of the requirements of Chapter V GDPR and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights regarding their transfers of personal data to the USA” (paragraph 10.11). [read post]
18 May 2023, 8:01 am
Most surprisingly to me, the court denied review in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:58 am
[I initially planned to write up this analysis as a short academic essay. [read post]
11 May 2023, 1:16 pm
New Relists Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 6:07 am
Long story short, they did and it is. [read post]
9 May 2023, 6:45 am
Short pieces: The End of Title 42 Might Be Chaotic, But It Doesn’t Have to Be Confusing. [read post]
5 May 2023, 8:28 am
L v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:33 am
USA, LLC v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 7:38 am
," and I wrote up a short (12-page) article for that. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
In short, the Manhattan DA’s case rests on firm legal footing. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 3:03 pm
The law of some states seems to reject this theory, see, e.g., Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 4:12 am
Honeywell Safety Products USA, Inc. v. [read post]
