Search for: "SIMMONS v. HARRIS"
Results 41 - 60
of 106
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm
Simmons-Harris, in which the Supreme Court held in a 5-4 decision that the system was constitutional because it provided “true choice” to parents. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 6:13 am
LaShawn Harris speaks about her Sex Workers, Psychics, and Numbers Runners: Black Women in New York City's Underground Economy. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 6:08 am
Simmons-Harris. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:27 am
And, in Locke v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
Chapter v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 5:13 am
Simmons-Harris, 536 U.S.... [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:03 am
Epstein, Philip Richter, Peter Simmons, and Gail Weinstein. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Simmons v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:11 pm
Sch. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:19 am
Burger, Harry Blackmun, Lewis F. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:03 am
In Byrne and Jones Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 6:03 pm
Simmons-Harris dissent – to “protect[t] the Nation’s social fabric from religious conflict. [read post]
8 May 2014, 11:43 am
Simmons-Harris dissent – to “protect[t] the Nation’s social fabric from religious conflict. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:24 am
Simmons v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:07 am
Simmons-Harris (2002). [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
In Zelman v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:37 pm
Simon Harris agreed, pointing his speech in the same direction. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:45 am
Simmons-Harris, 536 U.S. 639 (2002) (No U.S. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am
Suppose President Obama wins all of the electoral votes from (1) all of the Northeastern states except New Hampshire; (2) Maryland, Delaware, the District of Columbia, and Virginia; (3) all of the states that border on the Pacific Ocean except Alaska; and (4) New Mexico, Colorado, Minnesota, Illinois, and Michigan. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 1:46 am
In granting the motion, the court determined, inter alia, that defendants established as a matter of law that plaintiff is unable to prove that defendants' [*2]negligence is a proximate cause of plaintiff's damages (see Robbins v Harris Beach & Wilcox, 291 AD2d 797, 798). [read post]
