Search for: "SMALL v GOOD"
Results 41 - 60
of 8,339
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2024, 6:30 am
Connecticut and Stanley v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 8:35 am
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama delivered a decision in the case National Small Business United v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 11:30 am
No small feat. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 8:00 am
” Dobyne v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am
I do not consider a copper bowl with two small rings on the side to be ‘a decent font with a cover’. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Small Business Administration’s Small Business Size Regulations or (ii) meet one of 16 different sets of criteria in the proposed regulation. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 3:20 pm
³ See, D’Amore v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:37 am
These Phonorecords IV rates are in effect for five years, but the next negotiation for new rates is coming soon (called Phonorecords V or PR V for short). [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:29 pm
The bill was significantly amended, ameliorating its harsh effect, now requiring MDE to make specific findings and consult with specified stakeholders in advance of promulgating any regulations negatively impacting the production of cement, all of which may in the end do more good than harm (.. just the opposite of what the bill as introduced proposed) in protecting the vital industrial sector of cement manufacturer from future GHG emission regulation. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
In sharp contrast with Nixon v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:59 pm
After rage-tweeting throughout the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:52 am
” So far, so good. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
(Some media reports state he was holding up a small crucifix.) [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 pm
[2] Lewandowski v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:05 pm
Bembury v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
One of the hallmarks of PCCE is that it brings together academics, regulators, and industry professionals, and allows us to have candid conversations about corporate misconduct and the ways in which we can all work together to improve compliance. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
" Even if one had good reason to believe that the ordinance aimed only at quiet, one still would likely conclude that it covers electric cars because, as Justice Scalia wrote for the Court in Oncale v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 3:38 am
She’s carrying her small, yellow basket; ready to dive into the quality products from the Danish supermarket chain Irma. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
For that reason, a properly crafted rule (of the kind most universities have) to prevent it would certainly be constitutionally permissible, and (in my opinion) a good idea. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:43 pm
Particularly in a lawsuit over a $1.2 million, which is an incredibly small figure in the governmental scheme of things? [read post]
