Search for: "SMALL v. CONVENIENCE PLUS" Results 41 - 60 of 95
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
But with one exception, the case law on the admissibility of electronic records and electronic discovery ignores them; see: R. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
 Harking back to a time before fax, email, and before any of our intellectual property laws in the UK existed in their present form, when neither OHIM nor the EPO existed and WIPO was but a babe, he reminisced thus:WHERE ARE WE v WHERE I THOUGHT WE’D BE My first taste of IP came in 1973, when I found myself researching for a PhD on ownership of IP rights. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Modry v Alberta Health Services, 2015 ABCA 265 [109] Whether or not the respondent surgeon is, in fact, entitled to reinstatement on account of his status as a medical staff appointment with AHS under the Hospitals Act does not end the analysis under the balance of convenience arm of the tripartite test. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:16 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
., the life of the author plus another 70-years). [read post]