Search for: "SMITH v. LEAHY" Results 41 - 60 of 298
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2018, 7:17 pm by Aurora Barnes
The petition of the day is: Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:23 am by Justin Cosgrove
The US Supreme Court [official website] upheld [opinion, PDF] several provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) [text, PDF] on Monday. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 6:10 am by Ralph A. Dengler
Coming off a year that included the Smith-Leahy “America Invents Act,” 2012 portends to have some significant developments in IP law. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 8:18 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- As the dodo of patent practice, the number of interferences has been steadily dwindling since enactment of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act in 2012 abolished the practice in favor of a "first inventor to file" regime and a derivation proceeding for instances where a patentee is found to have taken the invention from the true inventor (35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
" This sentiment can describe much of U.S. patent law over the last decade and a half, between the ill-fated USPTO "claims and continuation" rules, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, and the Supreme Court's various forays into numerous areas of the law. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 9:14 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act prescribed two very different post-grant review proceedings in U.S. patent law. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 7:52 am by Dennis Crouch
Most of these involve changes to USPTO procedure that implement aspects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 9:23 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- Many of the complaints from patent holders over the PTO's inter partes review process under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (codified in pertinent part at 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 9:15 pm by Patent Docs
By Michael Borella -- Section 18 of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) established a transitional program through which the USPTO conducts post-grant reviews of covered business method (CBM) patents. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- Diligence is a patent concept whose applicability was severely restricted under the changes in U.S. patent law created under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Facts of Return Mail Inc v United States Postal Service The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) established the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 8:47 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has benefited, particularly after enactment of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, from the deference to its factual findings mandated by the Supreme Court's interpretation in Dickenson v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 9:06 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- The value of the post-grant review programs (post-grant review, inter partes review, and covered business methods review) has been debated since these provisions were enacted as part of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act in 2012. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:58 pm by Patent Docs
Postal Service, in order to answer the question whether the government can bring post-grant review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, or AIA. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:42 pm by Jaclyn Belczyk
This review system was created by Congress in the 2011 Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:56 pm by Patent Docs
Thus, the Court held in Cuozzo Speed Technologies LLC v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 1:15 pm by Rebecca Tapscott
In particular, the USPTO is considering the codification or modification of its current policies and practices with respect to instituting trials before the Office under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 5:18 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Helsinn Healthcare v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:53 pm by Justin E. Gray
D.3 Should President Obama sign the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act as expected, the threshold for initiating an inter partes reexamination will immediately change. [read post]