Search for: "SMITH-HARRIS v. HARRIS" Results 41 - 60 of 674
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2017, 9:51 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 91670, April 24, 2017) and dismissed a Rastafarian inmate's challenge to grooming regulations that require all male inmates to receive a closely cropped haircut.In Smith v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Harris [SCOTUSBlog symposium] “What Do We Mean By a “Pro-Business” Court — And Should We Care? [read post]
29 May 2010, 12:10 pm
April 21, 2010)*: Thompson properly conducted a Terry stop when he asked first Smith and then Harris to exit the vehicle. [read post]
27 May 2015, 6:30 am by Reuel Schiller
For example, LARC houses the Norman Leonard Collection, which includes materials on Harry Bridges’ trials, Smith Act cases (including Dennis v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:40 am by Eugene Volokh
Smith (coupled with a concurrence from denial of en banc rehearing by the original panel, plus Judge Pregerson). [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 6:07 am by Steven Cohen
Facts: This case (Quantum Fitness Corporation et al v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Here, the defendants met their burden by establishing, prima facie, that they did not fail to exercise the requisite skill and knowledge in their representation of the plaintiff (see Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP v Telecommunications Sys., Inc. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(See e.g., Leff v Fulbright & aworski, L.L.P., 78 AD3d 531, 533 [1st Dept 2010], lv denied 17 NY3d 705 [2011] [damages in malpractice case “grossly speculative” where plaintiff could not establish what would have occurred but for defendants’ conduct]; Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Grp. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 1:00 pm by Mary Whisner
A unit of the Special Collections Department of the University of Washington Libraries, the Labor Archives is a collaborative project of the Harry Bridges Center for Labor Studies and the University of Washington Libraries. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:14 am by John Jascob
According to the letter, the subpoenas are actually an effort by Exxon to obtain records it could not get by other means.The attorneys general also cited the Supreme Court’s decision in Younger v. [read post]