Search for: "SONG V. HOLDER"
Results 41 - 60
of 433
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2022, 6:09 am
The California Supreme Court has ruled in Pulliam v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 12:04 pm
[2] It’s suit alleged that Spotify infringed on copyrights to 243 of Eminem’s songs by streaming the songs without appropriate licenses. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 6:02 pm
Sync licenses are negotiated directly with the copyright holder. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 12:02 pm
The American Bankers Association, American Financial Services Association, California Financial Services Association, and Consumer Bankers Association have filed a joint amicus brief with the California Supreme Court in Pulliam v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 10:00 am
In a lawsuit that was originally filed in 2013 titled, Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 10:00 am
Pursuant to the 2015 case of Lenz v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 6:40 am
These cases are Lafferty v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 4:12 am
One reason that expectation would be justified is that Title I requires services to try hard(er) to match song royalties with song owners. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 8:46 am
LLC v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 11:24 am
As we saw in the Lenz v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 9:43 pm
In Campbell v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 9:43 pm
In Campbell v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:48 am
The data identify the songs and the composers. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Bork v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 9:38 am
Spinrilla is “a streaming and downloading service for hip-hop music” consisting of over 1.4M songs. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:48 am
That applies to all fields of IP law, in fact: patent holders will also argue that someone should just work around (or take a license if available). [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 11:36 am
The case is Chapman v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 7:34 am
Regarding the right of publicity, claims that interfere with a copyright holder's exercise of the rights afforded under the Copyright Act are preempted unless the claim serves a serves a distinct state interest. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:43 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
