Search for: "STANFORD v. STANFORD"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2024, 7:26 am
Prince and McNatt v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
After all, as Oona Hathaway, Maggie Mills, and Thomas Poston note in their forthcoming Stanford Law Review article, “Ukraine’s most powerful asset in the war has been its capacity to demonstrate time and again that it is consistently on the right side of the law against an opponent bent on breaking every rule on the books. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm
Sims, Gideon v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am
And don’t get me started on the Reasonably Scared Cop Rule of Graham v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
[The issues, arguments, and evidence raised by Mikhail have already been addressed by extant scholarship, including our scholarship. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
This is the second in a hopefully finite series of blog posts about the legal issues in the NetChoice cases, in which platforms raise First Amendment challenges to social media laws in Texas and Florida. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, dissented from the cert denial in Coalition for TJ v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
In short, the court concluded in LePage v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
For example, in Smith v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
The better answer, we argue here and in a forthcoming article in the Stanford Law Review, is to rely on legitimate, collective countermeasures to continue to freeze Russian central bank assets until Russia meets its obligation to pay reparations. [read post]
SCOTUS Repeated Relisting of a Case on the Meaning of Race Neutrality--and a Plug for my new Article
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Sonja Starr in the Stanford Law Review. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 11:41 pm
” That case, now styled Murthy v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm
, 48 Stanford Law Review 113 (1995-1996). [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
(Infodocket) ICYMI, Trump v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:33 am
Susan V. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:54 pm
Department of Commerce and Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm
How do the NetChoice cases relate to Murthy v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
As we read the brief, the Amars have retreated from the central position they put forward in an influential 1995 Stanford Law Review article. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
Sunstein Administrative Law Scholars Amici Brief: SEC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 11:40 am
What began as an exploratory brainstorm at the Stanford Generative AI and Law Workshop[7] became active and ongoing solicitations of input from legal and technical experts across a spectrum of industry verticals; and eventually, evolving to a formalized set of guiding principles.[8] The outcomes of the initial report demonstrated that existing responsibilities of legal professionals (e.g. [read post]
