Search for: "STATE EMPLOYEES v. Personnel Bd." Results 41 - 60 of 74
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Under that test, an employee's speech could be restricted if the "employee's speech interests are outweighed by the interest of the State, as an employer, in promoting the efficiency of the public services it performs through its employees. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:35 am
" (citation omitted)];Matter of Kittredge v Planning Bd. of Town of Liberty, 57 AD3d 1336, 1339 [2008] ["In construing a statute, a court must attempt to harmonize all its provisions and to give meaning to all its parts, considered as a whole, in accord with legislative intent. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:10 am
The Appellate Division ruled that Berrios was terminated while serving as a probationary employee and such personnel may be terminated at any time during the probationary period without being given a reason and without a hearing.** Another element in this case concerned so-called “Jarema Credit. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:27 pm
Bd. , No. 073745 In a claim for violation of the Hatch Act which prohibits state or local officer or employee from being a candidate for elective office, grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant-Merit Systems Protection Board is affirmed over claims that: 1) the district court erred in concluding that Board did not abuse its discretion in determining that plaintiff's violation of the Hatch Act, regulating the political activity of state… [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
§ 145 includes personnel expenses incurred by the U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 11:47 am
Personnel Bd. of Jefferson County, Ala., No. 08-488Title VII/ (1) Can a court-appointed receiver be sued as an employer under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for retaliatory employment decisions made during his receivership? [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 6:14 am by lawmrh
View the Head Order in “Virginia State Bar EX REL, Second District Committee v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Personnel Bd. of Jefferson County, Ala., No. 08-488*Title VII/ (1) Can a court-appointed receiver be sued as an employer under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for retaliatory employment decisions made during his receivership? [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Appeal of JANE DOE from action of the Board of Education of the Port Byron Central School District regarding a personnel action.Decision of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 17,627Elia, Commissioner. [read post]