Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF B. J. and J. J." Results 41 - 60 of 4,620
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2018, 1:00 am by Diane Tweedlie
Rule 113(1) EPC requires that communications from the EPO shall be signed by and state the name of the responsible employee. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 8:25 am
This representation was belied by B&J's partnership agreement, which stated that the firm was formed to conduct a securities business with Hammonds as president. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 7:20 am by Nicolas Round (Bristows)
The judge began with a broad definition: Stated generally the law is clear that patents are directed to those likely to have a real and practical interest in the subject matter of the invention[2]. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Therefore, for the purpose of deciding whether substantive examination before the EPO as a regional patent granting authority has begun, acts performed by the EPO as an international authority under the PCT are not relevant (J 37/03 and J 38/03 [6]). [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am by Pace Law Library
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW.Bressman, Lisa Schultz and Robert B. [read post]
  This patent had previously been held valid and infringed/essential by Birss J in the context of the Unwired Planet v Huawei dispute (a copy of Birss J’s decision is here). [read post]