Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF C. C." Results 41 - 60 of 27,436
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 6:30 am by John Jascob
That C&DI had concluded that a family trust located in the state where a Rule 147 offering was to occur could not be offered securities or purchase securities where the trust had a non-resident beneficiary that held a 50 percent interest in the trust. [read post]
16 May 2024, 5:24 am by admin
The Competition Tribunal would have the power to grant private parties leave to make applications for remedies under section 74.1 (the remedies provision for civil deceptive marketing practices under Part VII.1) where it was satisfied that it was in the public interest to do so. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 12:24 am by admin
In general, section 10.1 gives the Bureau the power to conduct inquiries into the state of competition in a market or industry if the Commissioner of Competition is of the opinion that it is in the public interest to do so. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 12:20 pm by msW1Ld
On September 6, 2011, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York denied summary judgment for vitamin C manufacturers in In re Vitamin C Antitrust Litig., MDL No. 1738 (Decision (Vit C)). [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:52 am by Michael Geist
‍1 (1) The Minister, if he or she is of the opinion that it is in the public interest to do so, may direct the Commissioner to conduct an inquiry into the state of competition in a market or industry. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:00 am by Michael Geist
Instead, the passage of Bill C-11 signals a restoration of a members-only club in which the public, public interest groups, and even digital creators need not apply. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 2:13 pm by admin
March 16, 2013 In a very interesting case reported by the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg and others, a U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 3:45 pm
It cited the Court of Justice's judgment in Joined Cases C-338/04, C-359/04 and C-360/04 Placanica and basically held that the Norwegian system was an appropriate and proportionate system to curb gaming addiction. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:13 am
Consumers, knowing that the use permitted by such regulations is very limited, have only a limited interest in buying that product (Case C-110/05 Commission v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 7:15 am by Michael Geist
In a recent article on how digital creators are contemplating leaving Canada as a result of Bill C-11’s regulation of user content, the CRTC stated: We strongly encourage interested parties – like TikTok users – to monitor our announcements and participate in public processes. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 11:30 pm by Alexandre Lodie
Despite this distancing of the ECJ from the General court, the scope and interest of these two decisions should not be overestimated, as it is discussed in the next section. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 6:51 pm by Doug Cornelius
In reviewing eligibility for the Real Estate Exception, the SEC has taken the position that the exclusion in Section 3(c)(5)(C) may be available to an issuer if: at least 55% of its assets consist of “mortgages and other liens on and interests in real estate” (called “qualifying interests”) and the remaining 45% of its assets consist primarily of “real estate-type interests;” at least 80% of its total assets consist… [read post]