Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF K. V. & K. V." Results 41 - 60 of 1,569
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2023, 1:12 am by Kouros Sadeghi-Nejad
Through his studies, Kouros has developed a keen interest in the intersection of law, politics, culture, and the arts. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
On August 25, 2023, two SEC compliance and disclosure interpretations (“C&DI”) were issued related to these quarterly disclosures.[1] C&DI 133A.01 states that Item 408(a)(1) of Regulation S-K does not require disclosure of termination of a plan that ends due to expiration or completion of the plan in accordance with its terms, without any action by an individual. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
On August 25, 2023, two SEC compliance and disclosure interpretations (“C&DI”) were issued related to these quarterly disclosures.[1] C&DI 133A.01 states that Item 408(a)(1) of Regulation S-K does not require disclosure of termination of a plan that ends due to expiration or completion of the plan in accordance with its terms, without any action by an individual. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
It is a “very uncertain time” for clients, said Ryan Carney, a government affairs advisor at K&L Gates. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 7:36 am by Megan Dell
Defined contribution plans can include: 401(k) Plan: The 401(k) plan is one of the most well-known defined contribution plans in the United States. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
As the following discussion shows, this is a particularly interesting time in the world of D&O. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 11:05 am by Benson Varghese
§ 922(a), (b), (o), (v), & (w) Description It is unlawful to knowingly possess or manufacture certain types of firearms. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 6:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” By clearly stating that H&K is representing “you” – in this case, plaintiff – the document can reasonably create the impression that H&K was first and foremost representing plaintiff’s interests. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:34 am by Peter Mahler
The burden then shifted to the petitioner to raise a question of fact as to whether the statute of limitations has been tolled or is otherwise inapplicable, or whether the petitioner actually commenced the proceeding within the applicable limitations period (see Edem v Wondemagegehu, 175 AD3d at 467; Coleman v Wells Fargo & Co. [read post]