Search for: "STATE TAX COURTS JUDICIAL"
Results 41 - 60
of 5,024
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2024, 5:49 am
As the cases proceed through the judicial system, the business community and advocates for labor rights are closely monitoring the situation. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:27 am
The Courts The most important consideration in the discussion has to do with the three states’ respective courts. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
Some courts innovated. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am
The Court had recognized limits on the federal government’s tax power, but those limits gave way to allow anti-drug legislation. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:02 pm
The Final Rule states tax-exempt status is one factor to be considered but does not preclude inquiry into an entity’s operations and goals, citing related precedent. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 2:34 pm
The Final Rule states tax-exempt status is one factor to be considered but does not preclude inquiry into an entity’s operations and goals, citing related precedent. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:08 pm
IRS, No. 22-1308 is an appeal from the United States Tax Court. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
A few months after the Oregon hearings, Judge Weinstein, in the fall of 1996, along with other federal and state judges, held a “Daubert” hearing on the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony in breast implant cases, pending in New York state and federal courts. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 7:19 am
That said, the FTC also opines in the final rule commentary that both judicial decisions and agency precedent recognize that not all entities claiming tax-exempt status as non-profits fall outside the agency’s jurisdiction. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:44 am
In reaching its decision, Judge Easterbrook specifically reviewed the history of this type of merger objection litigation, noting that as a result of unfavorable case law, the plaintiffs’ lawyers that bring this type of litigation have in recent years moved their cases from state court to federal court, in part in the hopes of evading judicial review of the agreed-upon fees. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 11:42 am
In states where nonjudicial settlement agreements are permitted, their use can avoid the costs, delays, and lack of privacy associated with judicial proceedings. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:24 pm
The new law is effective March 11, 2024 and applies to all open tax periods, but not assessments under judicial review by the Administrative Law Court, the South Carolina Court of Appeals, or the South Carolina Supreme Court as of that date. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 10:09 am
Apparently, it is now necessary to state the obvious: Not all prisoners are hostages. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
Leo Rejects Senate Subpoena from Panel Probing Gifts to Supreme Court Justices MSN – Tobi Raji (Washington Post) | Published: 4/11/2024 The Senate Judiciary Committee sent a subpoena to conservative judicial activist Leonard Leo as part of a months-long inquiry into undisclosed gifts to Supreme Court justices and he promptly rejected it, calling the move “politically motivated. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Because challenges were filed in multiple circuit courts, the Eighth Circuit was selected by lottery to decide all of the related petitions. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Judicial Conference’s Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules endorsed the proposal following calls by Democratic lawmakers and others for changes to shed a light on the extent to which litigants secretly fund efforts to influence cases’ outcomes through amicus, or friend-of-the-court, briefs. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
It’s just that today, with MPA president Charles Rivkin openly calling on Congress “to enact judicial site-blocking legislation here in the United States,” the MPA is taking its mask off. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:05 pm
Assuming that Congress’s position is that such money does count as income, would it be incompatible with originalism for the Court to not intervene with the tax collection? [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am
Delaware law, for example, does not authorize a claim for judicial dissolution of a close corporation based on shareholder oppression. [read post]
