Search for: "STATE V. APPLE" Results 41 - 60 of 4,462
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
[2] See Senators Wiener & Stern Respond to Governor Pausing Funding To Implement Landmark Climate Laws | Senator Scott Wiener (ca.gov) [3] Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:25 pm by Xandra Kramer
This is admittedly a setback for the collective protection of privacy rights, notably similar to the one following the 2021 United Kingdom Supreme Court ruling in Lloyd v Google. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:23 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch In January 2024 a then-secret order from US Customs and Border Protection (CPB) had a major impact in the Masimo v. [read post]
  A medical facility in the United States contracts with a company headquartered in a country of concern to provide IT-related services. [read post]
Apple the High Court of Justice stated (para. 45): ‘To make the patentee wait for a year or more from infringement finding to FRAND trial would be almost like a compulsory licence, and that is not justified. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Kaufman v Boies Schiller Flexner 2024 NY Slip Op 00804 Decided on February 15, 2024Appellate Division, First Department is a case where a second bite at the apple fails. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Unknown
The 2023 Proxy Statement stated that Apple intended to award the NEOs $77.5 million in performance-based compensation in each of 2021 and 2022. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm
Meaning that the employer should get two bites at the apple: one in the arbitration proceeding, and another one in court.I could say a lot about the opportunity/incentive aspect of res judicata, but my facial reaction can be summed up fairly quickly. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am by INFORRM
On 14 February 2024 there will be a strike out/summary judgment application in the case of Chowdhury-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department KB-2023-003368. [read post]