Search for: "STATE V. BULLCOMING" Results 41 - 60 of 192
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2011, 5:01 am by Russ Bensing
  A scenario similar to Bullcoming’s was presented in Ohio in State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
Finally, to make clear that presenting a Roadblock Form does not violate the Confrontation Clause, the Court, bolstered by the decision in Bullcoming v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:03 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the Court except as to part IV and footnote 6 in Bullcoming v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts (129 S.Ct. 2527 [June 25, 2009]), the United States Supreme Court held that the Confrontation Clause requires that in order for the prosecution to be able to introduce a forensic laboratory report at trial, the prosecutor must present a live witness to testify to the truth of the statements made in the report subject to cross-examination. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 11:53 am by Dwight Sullivan
  First came last term’s CAAF decision in United States v. [read post]