Search for: "STATE v LAMERE"
Results 41 - 52
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2008, 7:55 am
This is an outlook that not even the Supreme Court intended in R. v. [read post]
30 May 2021, 8:57 pm
Davidson, 1989 CanLII 92 (SCC), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1038, at p. 1078, per Lamer J. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 2:49 pm
Though commonly referred to as simply “freedom of speech,” the Charter‘s expressive guarantee under s. 2(b) is slightly more refined as, freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication; Justice Lamer, in discussing the role of the media in light of competing interests such as the right to a fair trial, stated in Dagenais v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
For example, in Graat v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:01 am
Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 8:44 pm
3, 5 and 7 of the EIPA and the Export Control List, and the Geneva Conventions Act, applying for judicial review in 2017 in Turp v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:11 am
Support for this conclusion may be found in Dagenais v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Entrapment has similarly failed as a defence in terrorism prosecutions in the United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
Chief Justice Lamer has stated extra-judicially that “[t]he Charter can be understood to give effect to Canada’s international legal obligations, and should therefore be interpreted in a way that conforms to those obligations. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:00 am
” Such critics included then Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin, former Chief Justice Antonio Lamer and the Canadian Judicial Council. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 6:26 pm
It may have amused certain of his cronies to see good ol' boy Ezra Levant ambush, bully and harangue the very unfortunate woman assigned by the Alberta Human Rights and Citizenship Commission to investigate the complaints advanced against him. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
But with one exception, the case law on the admissibility of electronic records and electronic discovery ignores them; see: R. v. [read post]
