Search for: "STATE v MACKINNON" Results 41 - 60 of 77
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
This column will develop these two perspectives.Easier to DefendSince the Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 9:59 am by Eric Goldman
Related blog post. * Recorder: FedEx Says It Can’t Face Charges for Illegal Drug Shipments * MacKinnon v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 4:49 am by Emma Snell
Robbie Gramer, Amy Mackinnon and Jack Detsch report for Foreign Policy. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Rebecca MacKinnon’s new book, ‘Consent of the Networked: The Worldwide Struggle for Internet Freedom‘, has been reviewed by John Kampfner here. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:30 pm
 On one hand, two years ago, in United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 9:05 am by Jack Sharman
When the IRS happens upon the money trail, and a top prosecutor leans on him to turn state’s evidence and finger some of the corrupt justices, Robbie calls on George Mason, veteran Kindle County lawyer, to represent him and win the best deal he can. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 12:31 am
That provision is 104 words long, though admittedly it pales into insignificance when measured against the 621 words of s.4, the infringement provision of the UK unlamented Trade Marks Act 1938, a provision of "fuliginous obscurity according to Lord Justice Mackinnon in Bismag Ltd v Amblins (Chemists) Ltd [1940] 1 Ch 667]. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
. “This article is inaccurate and misrepresents the facts” the corporation stated, as reported by Tabloid Watch here. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm by Carl Custer
., Koch, A.G. and Møgelmose, V., 2022. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 6:35 am
With noteworthy exceptions - Catherine MacKinnon, thirty years ago, on Roe v Wade, and more recently Marc Spindelman on Lawrence and Goodrich - there's just nothing comparable on the reproductive/sexuality side of the ledger. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
’ 28 February 2012, 1pm, ‘Consent of the Networked: The Worldwide Struggle for Internet Freedom‘ – Rebecca MacKinnon’, at Polis, LSE, Clement House Room 302 (Third Floor), Clement House, 99 Aldwych. 29 February 2012, 9am-2pm. ‘Justice Wide Open‘. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 11:48 pm
If a student writes on an exam at a state school that the First Amendment doesn't apply to the states, the student gets a bad grade. [read post]