Search for: "STATE v. CITES SERVICE OIL COMPANY" Results 41 - 60 of 270
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2021, 8:12 am by Brian Zupruk
As for Venezuela, U.S. sanctions against the Maduro regime largely target Venezuela’s financial sector, state-owned oil company Petroleos de Venezuela, S.A. and entities related to terrorism and drug trafficking. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
Jordan cited a 2008 study showing that whistleblower tips were responsible for exposing over half of all public company fraud schemes. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 8:43 am by Kevin Scott and Donna Ruscitti
A blow to cybersecurity and privacy enforcement and potential legislation to come While the case arose in the context of payday lending, the decision in AMG Capital v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 5:01 am by Unknown
Curious, I dug up the appellate opinion, U.S. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Jordan Brunner
  Companies that have received the most attention are Huawei, Hikvision, the China National Offshore Oil Corporation and the Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
Companies use letters of intent as a versatile tool to meet the needs of their business transactions. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am by Jack Sharman
United States,[vi] the Supreme Court that the companion mail-fraud statute applied only to schemes to defraud others of money or property, not honest services. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Speed used other counsel to advise him for the oil and gas operations matters in the company’s fracking businesses. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Sean Quirk
” Since the July 12, 2016, arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 6:25 pm by Joseph J. Lazzarotti
” This year, similar claims have been made against Shell Oil Company in connection with its 401(k) plan. [read post]
  Adversaries of the MOPR could cite the IMF Report, other similar reports and/or federal tax laws to argue that fossil-fired resources are eligible to receive significant and substantial federal benefits. [read post]