Search for: "STATE v. FAVOR"
Results 41 - 60
of 37,123
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 2:09 pm
From Tilley v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:33 pm
., Appellants, v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 am
Respondent-Appellant White Oak Global Advisors, LLC appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Kaplan, J.), entered in favor of Petitioner-Appellee Trustees of the New York State Nurses Association Pension Plan on their petition to confirm an arbitral award between the parties. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 am
Respondent-Appellant White Oak Global Advisors, LLC appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Kaplan, J.), entered in favor of Petitioner-Appellee Trustees of the New York State Nurses Association Pension Plan on their petition to confirm an arbitral award between the parties. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:20 am
The brief writes that “[u]nder important principles of federalism, this Court should follow its pre-FilmTec cases and set aside its special patent rules in favor of the well-established body of state common law for interpreting contracts. [read post]
22 May 2024, 8:01 am
United States cited Path2Papers when arguing in favor of DACA. [read post]
22 May 2024, 7:00 am
v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am
In considering a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a cause of action, the court must afford the pleading a liberal construction, accept the facts as alleged in the pleading as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87; Bumpus v New York City Tr. [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am
In considering a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a cause of action, the court must afford the pleading a liberal construction, accept the facts as alleged in the pleading as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87; Bumpus v New York City Tr. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:03 am
Group 48, LP v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
The United States Supreme Court has gone rogue. [read post]
21 May 2024, 1:15 pm
In a recent case, a motorcyclist was fatally injured in an accident when his bike was struck by a car on a state highway. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:45 am
LKQ Corp. v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:17 am
Under Illinois v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:05 pm
The Ninth Circuit, in U.S. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:07 pm
Schedule I of the CSA imposes a complete criminal ban; schedules II through V allow drugs to be prescribed under certain conditions. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
Seven Justices found that the text and history of the Appropriations Clause favored the Bureau. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am
Warrants would also provide the focal point for political and legal mobilization in third states, including the United States, making it harder to sustain military aid to Israel. [read post]