Search for: "STATE v. JAMIE"
Results 41 - 60
of 564
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:21 am
The Court justified its departure from its earlier decisions by stating that technology has changed in the past couple decades, and working from home is a more viable solution than it was when it previously was rejected by the Court in Brenneman v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 5:24 am
Michael Foreman from my undergrad alma mater, Penn State, where he directs the Civil Rights Appellate Clinic at the law school; andJack Gross, plaintiff in Gross v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:00 am
And in April 2011, in the case of AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:23 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 3:25 pm
In Kearns v Canadian Tire Corporation, Jamie Kearns, a former Canadian Tire employee, brought a motion to enforce the terms of a settlement agreement that he had entered into with Canadian Tire, his former employer. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:52 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:47 pm
” In the case Lewis v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 10:05 pm
-response-to-mtdDownload doc.-025-statement-of-interest-of-the-us-turtle-mtn-v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 9:39 am
By Jamie LaPlante We reported in February on a Department of Labor (DOL) rule permitting same sex partners who are legally married to take FMLA leave to care for their spouse, regardless of whether they live in a state that recognizes same sex marriage (so long as they were legally married in a state that recognizes same sex marriage). [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 4:26 am
Belmora and its owner, Jamie Belcastro, have filed with the Supreme Court a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari [here], seeking review of the Fourth Circuit's decision in Belmora LLC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 8:46 am
State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:48 am
Ciaravino, 752 S.W.2d 923, 927 (Mo.App. 1988) (quoting State Savings Trust Co. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 3:40 pm
Plan v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 1:34 pm
Remember that if you are in a situation in which federal law is bad, argue that New York State's constitution is more protective of rights and make a state constitutional argument.The good news is that, as pointed out by Jamie Hobbs of the Monroe County Public Defender's Office, the current New York state case law is the opposite from the decision reached by the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
Because Jamie Morse v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 10:02 am
State of Ohio v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 2:59 am
In the wake of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:00 am
Jamie Lichter v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:32 am
Underwood v. [read post]
