Search for: "STATE v. LEYVA"
Results 41 - 48
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm
Absent a “a reasonably high degree of probability that the presumed fact follows from those proved directly” (People v Leyva, 38 NY2d 160, 166), “the danger . . . is that of logical gaps – that is, subjective inferential links based on probabilities of low grade or insufficient degree – which undetected, elevate coincidence and, therefore, suspicion into permissible inference” (People v Cleague, 22 NY2d 363). [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm
Absent a “a reasonably high degree of probability that the presumed fact follows from those proved directly” (People v Leyva, 38 NY2d 160, 166), “the danger . . . is that of logical gaps – that is, subjective inferential links based on probabilities of low grade or insufficient degree – which undetected, elevate coincidence and, therefore, suspicion into permissible inference” (People v Cleague, 22 NY2d 363). [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 11:45 pm
Leyva-Martinez: The Court affirmed Mr. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
State, 168 N.E.2d 372, 373 (N.Y. 1960). [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 3:47 pm
Leyva. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 4:13 pm
" The case of People v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 4:13 pm
" The case of People v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm
Butler, Medford OR) United States v. [read post]
