Search for: "STATE v. LOOMIS"
Results 41 - 60
of 98
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm
Alex Loomis considered whether the Supreme Court would extend previous precedents to IRAP v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:39 pm
Camp’s article A History of Tax Regulation Prior to the Administrative Procedure Act was cited in the following article: Brian Boyd, State v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 4:24 pm
In Ali v. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 5:42 am
John Bellinger commented that the Alien Tort Statute case Doe v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm
John Bellinger commented that the Alien Tort Statute case Doe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:57 pm
Finally, the justices asked the federal government to file a brief conveying its views on Loomis v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 9:03 am
” Finally, the justices asked the federal government to file a brief conveying its views on Loomis v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 7:03 am
In Hospadales v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 7:03 am
In Hospadales v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 5:43 am
As Jack noted earlier this morning, Lawfare's Alex Loomis has a fascinating new paper up on SSRN (for the moment, anyway) about the scope of Congress's Article I power to "define and punish . . . [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:55 am
In reaching its conclusion that COMPAS does not violate due process by using gender (NB: Loomis did not bring an Equal Protection claim) the court highlights its previous decision in State v. [read post]
21 May 2016, 7:19 am
Adam Klein provided a few thoughts on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Spokeo v. [read post]
I was Arrested for Grand Larceny In New York: Challenging Property Value to Lessen Criminal Exposure
5 Apr 2016, 8:12 am
Furthermore, ‘[c]onclusory statements and rough estimates of value are not sufficient’ to establish the value of the property (People v Loomis, 56 AD3d 1046, 1047; see People v Walker, 119 AD3d 1402, 1402-1403; People v Pallagi, 91 AD3d 1266, 1269). [read post]
I was Arrested for Grand Larceny In New York: Challenging Property Value to Lessen Criminal Exposure
5 Apr 2016, 8:12 am
Furthermore, ‘[c]onclusory statements and rough estimates of value are not sufficient’ to establish the value of the property (People v Loomis, 56 AD3d 1046, 1047; see People v Walker, 119 AD3d 1402, 1402-1403; People v Pallagi, 91 AD3d 1266, 1269). [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 7:29 am
Alex Loomis provided a summary brief on Simon v. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 7:12 am
Alex Loomis walked us through the Department of Justice’s amicus brief in Weinstein v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 3:40 pm
The Administration of Haider al Abadi is worried that renewed sectarian tensions could unravel its fight against the Islamic State, forcing the country into an impossible balancing act between the United States, Iran, and Sunni Tribal fighters battling ISIS. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
In Schrems v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 3:48 am
The European Court of Justice ruled against the Safe Harbor framework in Schrems v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:04 pm
In my last post, I said that the European Court of Justice decision in Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
