Search for: "STATE v. MARQUES"
Results 41 - 60
of 170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2022, 8:55 am
, Crabtree v. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 11:07 am
IPWatchdog reported on the Court’s opinion in Illumina Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 2:25 pm
See CBS Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:07 am
MARQUES Class 46 (trade marks) * EUIPO “smart-seals” (?) [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:55 am
State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 1:35 pm
The Kluwer Copyright Blog, therefore, explains potential challenges that may arise.The implementation of the CDSM Directive is taking place in all Member States. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 4:21 pm
Constitution's Article 1 Section 9, C.3 states: 'No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed,' and Section 10 says: 'No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law. . . .' The 'words and the intent' of the Ex Post Facto… [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
After the latest developments in the dispute between Lindt and its German competitor Riegelein (see our report here), the Austrian state broadcaster ORF now reports on the latest instalment in the gold bunny dispute between Lindt and its Austrian competitor Hauswirth. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
This part of the inquiry is not about a public debate on, for example, state intervention, natural remedies, or whether there should even be community standards. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The PROMESA Board Members Are Not "Officers of the United States." So What Are They?
10 Jun 2020, 11:31 am
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Recently, the Supreme Court decided Financial Oversight and Management Bd. for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 4:59 pm
Citing McDaniel v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:20 am
Regarding designs, the MARQUES Class 99 blog carries two recent posts. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:59 am
How far does the first sale or "exhaustion" principle extend in the United States? [read post]
1 May 2013, 3:00 am
Maclean v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 3:44 am
Code § 1028(a)(1) and possessing a fraudulent identification document in violation of 18 U.S.Code § 1028(a)(6), Eric Marques Devlin–Bell, Jr. moved “to suppress all evidence taken from the laptop” found in his car on April 12. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:51 pm
On Constitutional Interpretation: Originalism v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 10:51 am
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 4:43 am
This is, of course, true for companies based in the territory of a State which is not a member of the EU, but also for the non-member States themselves, since those States are, within the meaning of EU law, public law entities. [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:20 pm
207/10Orifarm A/S and Orifarm Supply A/S v Merck & Co. [read post]
