Search for: "STATE v. PAEZ"
Results 41 - 60
of 256
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2012, 8:56 am
The claim was procedurally defaulted for federal habeas review.Fenebock v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 9:05 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 4:58 am
U.S. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:10 pm
In Lal v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 7:15 am
Washington v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 11:11 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 11:44 am
Judge Paez's opinion for the Ninth Circuit decides to adopt the plurality opinion in the underlying Supreme Court case (rather than Justice Sotomayor's concurrence) as the controlling legal principle, but states that he's not deciding -- for now -- whether the reasoning of the dissenting justices in that case can be evaluated when deciding which rule to follow under Marks. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 1:46 pm
So I can see why the panel here -- Judges Nelson, Paez, and Bybee -- dismisses the conviction as a violation of his Sixth Amendment speedy trial rights.But I gotta tell you that there's a big part of me that leans the other way. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 10:50 am
But in the other corner, weighing in with Judges Watford (joined by CJ Kozinski, Paez and Bea), is a dissental, also a great read. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:07 pm
That holding, Judge Paez explained in his concurral opinion, flows from United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 6:08 am
Schad v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 5:25 am
In Kent Equities Corp. v. [read post]
