Search for: "STEVENS v. PONDER"
Results 41 - 60
of 73
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2010, 1:43 pm
Supreme Court Decision in Bilski v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:53 pm
In fact, I wonder what John Adams would have made of a Supreme Court decision like Scott v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 7:44 pm
As Julian notes, there is a lot to ponder in the case. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:36 pm
Stevens? [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:52 am
In his term on the Court Stevens has not been a friend to the patentability of software over the years, See Exploring Justice Steven’s Patent Past for Clues, and was against an expansive view of patentability when he dissented in Diamond v. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 1:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:38 pm
V. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 7:12 am
Steven Shapiro, the legal director of the ACLU, has an opinion piece on last week’s Berghuis v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:54 am
Pena dissent to distinguish discriminatory from acceptable affirmative action policies, or, most recently, the pungent conclusion from his Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:11 pm
See the comments of DK and steven below. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 2:05 pm
Justice Stevens pressed the parties to say whether resolution of the case required the Court to decide the constitutionality of the all-comers policy. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 6:50 am
Doe (discipline & stay put); Shaffer v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 6:38 am
Kentucky and oral argument in Carachuri-Rosendo v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:47 am
Check the Bloate v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 1:20 pm
Breyer made repeated efforts on Wednesday to keep open the chances that an $18 million settlement of a major copyright dispute may yet get a full hearing on its fairness in federal court, but he found little support among other members of the Supreme Court as they pondered the scope of a federal court’s power over copyright lawsuits in Reed Elsevier v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 6:10 am
Following a comment by Kevin Reitz, Sentencing Law and Policy also ponders whether the precedent Harris v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 4:01 pm
The Court had ruled in 1833, in Barron v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
In 1990, in the case of Austin v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:59 pm
Friday to Black’s application for bail (Black v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 4:20 am
This situation has made many people ponder: what is the appropriate role of governmental bodies and international institutions when regulating the private sector. [read post]
