Search for: "STOCKER v. STOCKER"
Results 41 - 60
of 128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
Stocker v Stocker, heard 24 Jan 2019. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:48 pm
Supreme Court There are two media and information case listed before the Supreme Court this term Stocker v Stocker, 24 January 2019, 1 day (Lords Reed and Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) Cape Intermediate Ltd v Dring, 18 February 2019, 1.5 days (Lady Hall, Lord Kerr, Lord Briggs, Lady Arden and Lord Sales) Court of Justice of European Union The following cases are pending before the CJEU GC and Others v CNIL, Case… [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
Stocker v Stocker, heard 24 Jan 2019. [read post]
6 May 2019, 1:00 am
Stocker v Stocker, heard 24 Jan 2019. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
On Thursday 24 January, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Stocker v Stocker. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:37 pm
There is one appeal listed for January 2018 30 January 2018, Stocker v Stocker Permission Applications Applications for permission to appeal in the following case are awaiting decisions by the single judge Monroe v Hopkins Guise v Shah Lisle-Mainwaring v Associated Newspapers Denman v Associated Newspapers There is an application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court by some of the defendant which is pending in… [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:28 pm
The court reiterated the principles as set out in Jeynes v News Magazine Ltd [2008] EWCA, Civ. 130, as affirmed in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17. [read post]
10 May 2015, 4:19 pm
On 7 May 2015, there was a case management conference in the case of Stocker v Stocker. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 4:03 pm
Stocker v Stocker [2018] EWCA Civ 170 – the Supreme Court have granted permission to appeal. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 6:58 am
Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 A determination of meaning following a Facebook post from a divorcee regarding her ex-husband allegedly trying to strangle her. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 4:12 pm
Stocker v Stocker [2016] EWHC 474 (QB) (Mitting J) – the claimant succeeded in a claim based on defamatory comments by his ex-wife which she had made in exchanges on a public part of his new girlfriend’s Facebook page. [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 11:53 am
” Stocker Hinge Mfg. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 1:19 pm
Indeed, Granville v Betts, Stocker v Wedderburn and Wilson v Wilson were all cited in Wilson's case. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 3:23 am
The appeals court found that the facts of the case were similar to those in Interstate Scaffolding Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:14 am
Charles River Bridge v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 4:45 pm
This means it is not primarily equipped to deal with collective aspects of identity, such as race.[3] Perhaps this is because the “ordinary, reasonable reader” has neither race nor gender: a construct recognised as potential problematic “in key contexts that involve ‘culturally polarized understandings of fact’”.[4] In seeking to universalise the human experience, the hypothetical referee at the centre of defamation law overlooks and erases differences.[5] The… [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:06 pm
There is a judgment on liability and quantum (Burrell v Clifford [2016] EWHC 294 (Ch)), although Mr Justice Mann’s earlier decision dismissing Mr Clifford’s strike out application on limitation and triviality grounds (Burrell v Clifford [2015] EWHC 2001 (Ch)) is arguably of wider importance. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:14 am
Miller represented to Joe Stocker of First Bank that the David E. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 3:45 am
Back in 1986, in Ford v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 11:33 am
The following passage from the UK Supreme Court’s April 2019 decision in Stocker v Stocker[2019] UKSC 17 illustrates: ‘I agree with that, particularly the observation that it is wrong to engage in elaborate analysis of a tweet; it is likewise unwise to parse a Facebook posting for its theoretically or logically deducible meaning. [read post]
