Search for: "STONE v. FISH" Results 41 - 60 of 104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2014, 11:05 am by emagraken
A document created for the dominant purpose of litigation remains privileged throughout that litigation even if it is never used in evidence. [33]         In Stone v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 11:20 am by Emily Williams
Here’s a couple of things that may be of interest… SPORTS Braves v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:53 am
Perhaps not unpredictably, the move has not attuned Mexico and the USA to peaceful coexistence where tuna fishing and marketing are concerned. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 5:17 am
 Wilkinson v London Strategic Health Authority is an interesting decision on the entitlement to copyright in training materials which has been sitting for too long in the IPKat's in-tray -- but you can read about it now thanks to Mark Anderson's to-the-point dissection of the issues on IP Draughts. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
His body was discovered by an aide, sent to tell him of the arrival of the fish. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 7:30 pm
 When I drove out of my neighborhood to go fishing yesterday morning at 6:30, I could see water bubbling up from the storm sewers at the end of my street. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 3:20 pm
 It's good to see members of the intellectual property community rally round to assist one another, adds the IPKat.Either Martin gets to Dallas,or the fish get his paperThank you 2. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am by Cormac Early
Briefly: Stanley Fish has a column on United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 10:35 pm by Florian Mueller
Ericsson ... by Florian MuellerThe title of the complaint (which was filed by Fish & Richardson) is In the Matter of Certain Cellular Base Station Communication Equipment, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same (complaint no. 337-TA-3599). [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 8:02 am by Hayleigh Bosher
The four hundred and thirty-four goods range from CDs, DVDs, precious and semi-precious stones, to wigs, specialized underwear, false eyelashes, birdcages, hunting and fishing equipment, fireworks and nautical navigation. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 6:54 am by Eric Goldman
This does require the court to do some fancy footwork to distinguish the Rosetta Stone v. [read post]