Search for: "STRONG v BUTTS" Results 41 - 60 of 96
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2011, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
The protection given to public officials by Sullivan in US law has been extended to embrace public figures in general (Curtis Publishing Co v Butts, Associated Press v Walker 388 US 130 [1967]) Nor is a complete bar necessary to ensure freedom of speech. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am by Tobias Thienel
This doctrine holds,in the broadest outline, that English (like U.S.) courts 'will not sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another done within its own territory' (Underhill v Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250, 252 (1897)) or 'will not adjudicate upon the transactions of foreign sovereign states' (Buttes Gas Oil Co v Hammer (No 3) [1982] AC 888, 931G). [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Butts & Johnson, Sentinel Insurance Company administered by The Hartford, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am by Deanne Sowter
In reaching his decision, Justice Ball found that neither of the parents were strong witnesses, but the father was more credible (at para 30). [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 11:30 am by Jonathan Bailey
It’s common for reviewers and their subjects to butt heads over copyright issues. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:39 am by SHG
So fairness be damned.The same doctrinaire views we applaud when they serve to give the defendant half a chance, as in the Crawford line of cases, comes back to bite reason in the butt when it cuts the other way. [read post]