Search for: "STRYKER SALES, LLC"
Results 41 - 49
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
Stryker Corp. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
Forest Laboratories, Inc. turns law of declaratory judgment on its head: (Patent Docs), (Patent Baristas), Mircera (Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta) – Roche appeals preliminary injunction barring US sales of Mircera in patent infringement battle with Amgen: (Philip Brooks), (IP Law360), Norvasc (Amlodipine) – Ranbaxy becomes first foreign generic company to develop a generic product independently outside Japan and receive authorization from MHLW-Japan:… [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Copyright protection expiration in China: lifetime plus fifty (IP Dragon) EU experience and practice must show China the way concerning IPR protection at exhibitions (IP Dragon) Comparison between IPR in China relevant provisions of Foreign Trade Law 2004 and 1994 (IP Dragon) Thesis and publications about IPR in China (IP Dragon) 2009: New trends in China’s judicial protection of intellectual property rights (China Law Insight) Best practices in technology transfer and IP licensing in… [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
It joins an “overwhelming” majority of appellate courts to reaffirm the “well-settled” rule that product liability lies only against those involved in the manufacture and sale of products. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Dow Agrosciences LLC, 544 U.S. 431 (2005), as creating an irrebuttable presumption against preemption that overrode congressional intent:The Court of Appeals viewed Bates as having drastically changed this traditional preemption analysis, so as to make the presumption against preemption irrebuttable and to require examination of the statutory language alone. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
To bolster an assertion of on-sale bar, Microsoft used a previous case of trying to overcome prior art by claiming a pre-filing invention date. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
That is, if the defendants’ failure to test their [product] resulted in the sale of ‘defective’ [products] which ultimately injured plaintiff’s decedent, then the flawed design or manufacturing process would be the proximate cause of plaintiff's injuries, not the failure to test. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm
We’re always open to flattery, and it’s flattering to us when somebody thinks that we provide the best legal research available (at least without a prescription). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
By now Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A (1965) is so old as to be thought of as somewhat antediluvian. [read post]
