Search for: "SWEAT v. SWEAT" Results 41 - 60 of 636
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2015, 8:03 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
You know, if you’re sweating, they see you. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:07 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
You know, if you’re sweating, they see you. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:58 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
You know, if you’re sweating, they see you. [read post]
22 Aug 2015, 8:20 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
You know, if you’re sweating, they see you. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 11:46 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 91356 (D ID, July 2, 2014), an Idaho federal district court dismissed for failure to prosecute a Native American inmate's complaint regarding tearing down of the prison's sweat lodge and alleged retaliation for complaining that failure to provide wood for the sweat lodge violated a previous settlement agreement.In Villapando v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:42 pm by Donna Bader
I just read a new case from the 4/3 entitled Moody v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 5:47 pm
Hey all you SLAPPaholics out there, by now you've already devoured the Cal Supreme Court opinion -- and the ensuing flurry of blog posts and press articles -- regarding Baral v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 6:37 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 85208, June 29, 2015) and allowed an inmate to move ahead with his complaint that  he was repeatedly denied attendance at religious services, holiday celebrations, use of the sweat lodge, and formal recognition for his Mexican Indian faith.In Pelayo v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 5:47 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 133863 (ED CA, Aug. 7, 2018), a California federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing an inmate's complaint that he is not allowed to conduct sweat lodge ceremonies for himself and other indigenous inmates.In Crayton v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 7:00 am by Howard Friedman
Olivas, (9th Cir., Jan. 27, 2016), the 9th Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a complaint by a Native American inmate that for five months he was deprived of deer antlers used for sweat lodge ceremonies.In Terry v. [read post]