Search for: "Sacks v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 600
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2022, 5:46 am
Citing a Second Circuit case from 1977 as well as cases from the Seventh and Ninth Circuits, the Court of Appeals (Pooler, Sack and Park) notes that "an amended complaint ordinarily supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
It is not the case that such an election process to the United States House of Representatives is required by the United States Constitution. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 3:55 am
In Cupcake v Boomboom (covered here), the plaintiff looked to an operating agreement identifying the members, while defendant relied upon a submission to the State Liquor Authority identifying different members. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
The work has been comprehensively updated to take in the latest case including Lachaux, Stocker, Serafin, Lloyd v Google, Economou, Wright v Ver, Wright v Granath, Corbyn v Millett, Duchess of Sussex v Associated, and Soriano v Forensic News. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:54 am
And one of the things, especially for the book College Athletes for Hire: The Evolution and Legacy of the NCAA’s Amateur Myth, I worked with Allen Sack who had played formally at the University of Notre Dame and also was on the academic side of things. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:32 am
Judge Nardini writes, "The problem with Murray’s claim is that, as the Supreme Court held in Rivera v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 11:43 pm
The Taylor Review had this to say about the current state of employment law: “Regardless of how they are employed, whether in a traditional, full-time role or on a more flexible basis, people should understand what rights they have. [read post]
10 May 2022, 6:29 am
The Court of Appeals (Leval, Sack and Park) reverses. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:26 am
Apr. 26, 2022), the Circuit (Nardini, joined by Sack and Park), held that a state trial court’s erroneous denial of a defendant’s peremptory strike does not violate the federal Constitution under Rivera v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm
ANL offered its “sincere apologies” and agreed to pay substantial damages and legal costs, for the publication of an article that falsely alleged that the Claimant, Jo Wallace, was responsible for sex discrimination by sacking two straight white men as part of an attempt to obliterate their culture within the advertising agency that they all worked for. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 5:03 am
After receiving his advice, the City Council voted 4-3 to sack the plaintiff. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 5:14 am
Postiglione v Sacks & Sacks, LLP 2022 NY Slip Op 30148(U) January 19, 2022 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 513779/19 Judge: Karen B. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 1:48 pm
See United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 6:44 am
The case is Grant v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 1:43 pm
The case is Javier Cardenas et al. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 6:12 am
The case was dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 10:14 am
The case is We the Patriots, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:18 am
White (Vanderbilt University), on Friday, October 8, 2021 Tags: Capital allocation, Executive Compensation, Liquidity, Market conditions, Repurchases, Shareholder value SEC Form 10-K Comments Regarding Climate-Related Disclosures Posted by Brian V. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 5:51 am
The court's decision in New York v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 4:35 am
The case is entitled Port of Tacoma v. [read post]
