Search for: "Satellite Broadcasting & Communications v. FCC"
Results 41 - 60
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2007, 11:48 pm
Namely, Verizon claims the FCC overstepped the authority it was granted under the Communications Act of 1934, that the FCC violated the United States Constitution, that the FCC violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), and that the FCC's decision was arbitrary, capricious, unsupported by substantial evidence, and otherwise contrary to the law.[28] Verizon is only challenging the open access provision of the FCC's Service Rules. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 11:12 am
Supreme Court granted certiorari review in FCC v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 4:00 am
CBS v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 4:00 am
CBS v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 12:39 pm
Yet free speech casebooks usually devote very few pages to key First Amendment cases involving media ownership rules (like FCC v NCCB regarding ownership of newspapers and broadcasters) and access rules (like Turner II itself, giving access to cable lines for broadcasters, or CBS v FCC, giving access to broadcast stations for politicians). [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 11:20 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted a new hearing this past Friday in Joffe v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:47 am
Instead, the nationwide service that was delivered by satellite had to go to Congress to get its own copyright statutory licenses to retransmit broadcast programming, as now embodied in Sections 119 and 122 of the Copyright Act. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:34 am
On the other hand, he basically seemed, at least from my perspective, to think that if the court were simply to reaffirm what it did in FCC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 11:21 am
By “broadcasters,” I, and the FCC, mean those entities that have a license to broadcast over a certain over-the-air frequency, as opposed to cable or satellite or now streaming services. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 7:30 am
In fact, in Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:27 pm
Circuit in Comcast v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:12 am
By Berin Szoka & Adam Thierer We learned from The Wall Street Journal yesterday that “Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski gets a little peeved when people suggests that he wants to regulate the Internet. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
The Court has upheld laws like that in many instances, including Turner (requiring that cable systems carry broadcast television channels), Rumsfeld v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm
Circuit’s recent decision in Comcast v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
If you have been following the machinations by the Obama Justice Department [sic] over amending the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees, you may have found yourself wondering who was responsible for rejecting the good faith efforts of the songwriting community in favor of a cynical back room deal with multinational tech companies and broadcasters. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:42 pm
Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:15 pm
Obscenity is not at issue in the new case of Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 7:30 am
[v] Adam Thierer, The Progress & Freedom Foundation, Video Competition in a Digital Age, Testimony before the Subcommittee on Communications, Technology and the Internet, U.S. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
Comcast has been losing hundreds of thousands of subscribers each year to its competitors, such as satellite television providers who are able to offer their channel packages at lower prices. [32] Additionally, suppliers like NBCU and Walt Disney have been charging higher prices as broadcasters like FOX and CBS have declared an intention to start charging for their programs. [33] Comcast is losing business rapidly to selective, cheaper programs on the internet. [34] NBC, too, has… [read post]
