Search for: "Sauer v. Sauer"
Results 41 - 60
of 209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2009, 9:59 pm
The discussion, prompted by the recent ACLU v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:31 pm
By Kwame Mensah -- A free-flowing panel discussing the potential impact of Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 9:59 pm
Patent and Trademark Office and Myriad Genetics, among others, in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 4:51 am
Hans Sauer, the... [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
A third alternative is the type of settlement in Sauer v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm
Madison and McCullough v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 4:32 am
In order to prevail on this claim, the plaintiff must establish both that the defendants "failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession" (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442; see Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008, 1009-1010) and that their breach of this duty proximately caused her actual and ascertainable damages (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs,… [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 4:20 am
To establish proximate causation, the plaintiff must show that she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the defendant attorney’s [*2]negligence (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 442; Kluczka v Lecci, 63 AD3d 796, 797; Wray v Mallilo & Grossman, 54 AD3d 328, 329). [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:39 am
“To establish causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the lawyer’s negligence” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 442; see Garcia v Polsky, Shouldice & Rosen, P.C., 161 AD3d 828, 830 [2018]; Kliger-Weiss Infosystems, Inc. v Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C., 159 AD3d 683, 684 [2018]). [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 3:44 am
Barnett v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 4:19 am
Garcia v Polsky, Shouldice & Rosen, P.C. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:44 pm
In today’s case (Sauer v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:39 am
Supreme Court tackled a question “for the ages” in the Trump v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
” Kavanaugh – who served as a deputy to Ken Starr during his investigation of then-President Bill Clinton – cited the Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 5:19 am
Plaintiff’s contention that the motion court in the fee dispute would have awarded her predecision interest pursuant to CPLR 5001 is at best speculative (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442, 443 [2007]; see also Manufacturer’s & Traders Trust Co. v Reliance Ins. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:45 am
Conklin, who represented plaintiff in an underlying action alleging accounting malpractice, among other things, were entitled to dismissal of the complaint given that plaintiff failed to allege that defendants were negligent or that they proximately caused any damages (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]; Fielding v Kupferman, 65 AD3d 437, 442 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
“To establish causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the lawyer’s negligence” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 442; see Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008, 1009 [1996]). [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
Circuit’s decision in Blassingame v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:29 am
Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 N.Y.3d 438, 442 (2007), quoting McCoy v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:00 am
Newman v. [read post]
