Search for: "Scalia v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 4,615
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2024, 2:42 pm by Emma Babler
A broad cross-ideological array of economists and land-use scholars have concluded that it is responsible for massive housing shortages in many parts of the United States, thereby cutting off millions of people – particularly the poor and minorities – from economic and social opportunities. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Katherine Yon Ebright
No state, let alone the United States, engages in diplomatic relations with the cartels, nor do the cartels purport to maintain diplomatic relations. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
They’d look for some little snippet of text in the Lanham Act; Scalia was a textualist but he could read a law in its entirety. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
Furthermore, Story would expressly engage in a discussion of the Constitution's "officers of the United States"-language and "office under the United States" three sections later: in Section 791. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
" This shift followed the substantial and unprecedented government intervention in civic and economic life accompanying the United States' entry into World War I. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]