Search for: "Scalia v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 4,610
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
[Josh Blackman] A Response to Professor John Mikhail on "Officers of the United States"—Part II
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
Furthermore, Story would expressly engage in a discussion of the Constitution's "officers of the United States"-language and "office under the United States" three sections later: in Section 791. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Prof. Thomas Merrill on "Does Chevron Mandate Brand X?"
21 Feb 2024, 4:47 pm by Eugene Volokh
United States (1996)), and two came after (United States v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] A Response to John Mikhail on "Officers of the United States"—Part I
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm by Josh Blackman
For example, in Smith v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A Reality Check on "Officers of the United States" at the Founding
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Social and Economic Legislation during the Taft Court
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
" This shift followed the substantial and unprecedented government intervention in civic and economic life accompanying the United States' entry into World War I. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Comments on Robert Post’s Supreme Court History of the Taft Court, Part IV, The Taft Court as an Institution
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] Climate Activists Pour Red Powder On Constitution Case At National Archives
14 Feb 2024, 7:11 pm by Josh Blackman
(As much as I respect Justice Scalia's vote in Texas v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Myers, We Hardly Knew Ye?
14 Feb 2024, 3:30 am by Richard Murphy
United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926). [read post]
JOTWELL - The Journal of Things We Like (Lots) - https://jotwell.com/
[Josh Blackman] Why Does The Phrase "Not Herein Otherwise Provided For" Appear In The Appointments Clause?
10 Feb 2024, 11:12 pm by Josh Blackman
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part II: Justice Jackson Gets "Office under the United States"
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
She was teeing up the Scalia line! [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part I: Justice Gorsuch Gets "Officers of the United States"
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am by Josh Blackman
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] A Reply to Peter Keisler and Richard Bernstein, and Michael Luttig, on Section 3
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm by Josh Blackman
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
The Long Life and Sudden Demise of Federal Wetlands Protection
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 am by Dan Farber
United States. [read post]
Legal Planet - https://legal-planet.org/
:@WilliamBaude: The Use and Misuse of Section Three's "Legislative History": Part II
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
“In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents’ Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant’s VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern; Justice Scalia erred because there are no ‘Officers of the United States’ appointed outside Article II, Section II”
4 Feb 2024, 8:53 pm by Howard Bashman
“In Trump v. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
[Josh Blackman] In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents' Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant's VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Fund v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
:@WilliamBaude: The Objection that Enforcing Section Three is "Undemocratic"
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Will Baude
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Four: Trump’s Argument That His Tenure as President Did Not Subject Him to Section 3 Because the President is Not an “Officer of the United States”
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Weekend Roundup
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Scalia, J., thought Presidents were "officers of the United States" (Lawfare). [read post]
Legal History Blog - http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/
Lenity and Agency Deference in Garland v. Cargill, by Tess Saperstein
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am by Guest Author
United States, Justice Scalia stated, “we have never thought that the interpretation of those charged with prosecuting criminal statutes is entitled to deference. [read post]
Notice & Comment - https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/