Search for: "Schaefer v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 79
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2014, 5:26 am
Schaefer, 859 F.Supp.2d 397, 406 (U.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Texas, in 2003, and United States v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 10:50 am
Evans in 1996 and United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 1:12 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
Some states require the plaintiff to provide a specific trade secret disclosure document before discovery commences. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
Some states require the plaintiff to provide a specific trade secret disclosure document before discovery commences. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
Norquist states that his pledge is self-enforcing—”candidates and incumbents solemnly bind themselves”—but in a leading case cited in the Standler essay (above), Schaefer v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:49 am
” More recently, the Tenth Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:49 am
” More recently, the Tenth Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:17 am
See Schaefer-LaRose v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:02 pm
The Seventh Circuit took up this issue through a consolidated opinion on two collective actions, Schaefer-LaRose v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 12:02 pm
The Seventh Circuit took up this issue through a consolidated opinion on two collective actions, Schaefer-LaRose v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 10:17 pm
Litigation: Deference to Agency Briefs – Never Mind: The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit found that pharmaceutical sales representatives fell under the unambiguous administrative exception to the Department of Labor (DOL)’s Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) regulations in Schaefer-LaRose v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 2:37 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:50 am
In the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case Gena N. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 12:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:50 am
Overtime Pay Litigation, 2008 WL 4712769 at *2 (same); Schaefer–LaRose v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Likewise, Schaefer v. [read post]