Search for: "Schmerber v. California"
Results 41 - 60
of 87
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2009, 5:18 am
Murphy, 412 U.S. 291, 295 (1973) (finger nail scrapings); Schmerber v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:23 pm
The first case is Schmerber v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:56 pm
., referencing Schmerber v California, 384 US 757, 771-772 [1966]; 10 NYCRR 59.2[d]). [read post]
19 May 2007, 1:46 pm
California, 384 U.S. 757, 767, 86 S.Ct. 1826, 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966) (blood test for alcohol), and Winston v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 7:18 am
California, supra. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 12:00 pm
Although the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Schmerber v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 5:15 pm
Supreme Court held, in 1966’s Schmerber v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 10:18 pm
When making our Fourth Amendment inquiry, we must consider whether there is a “ clear indication’ that the intrusion will supply substantial probative evidence” (Matter of Abe A., 56 NY2d at 297, quoting Schmerber v California, 384 US 757, 770; see Cupp v Murphy, 412 US 291, 295). [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 7:40 am
Lee, 470 U.S. 753, 760 (1985); Schmerber v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:52 am
In Schmerber v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:13 pm
Supreme Court precedent in Schmerber v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:13 pm
Supreme Court precedent in Schmerber v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 10:24 am
Supreme Court allowed this in its ruling in Schmerber v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 6:41 pm
The case technically hinged on the interpretation of a 1966 case, Schmerber v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 10:21 am
That’s because courts relied upon Schmerber v. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 7:16 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Schmerber v. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 7:16 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Schmerber v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:56 am
Ct. 2160 (2016), relying largely on search incident to arrest doctrine. [2] Because the actual breathalyzer test is not “testimonial”, Schmerber v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:56 am
Ct. 2160 (2016), relying largely on search incident to arrest doctrine. [2] Because the actual breathalyzer test is not “testimonial”, Schmerber v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 7:05 pm
Schmerber v. [read post]
