Search for: "Scott v. United States Government et al" Results 41 - 60 of 162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Pappas et al. find that counterfeit cigarettes can have as much as seven times the lead of authentic brands, and close to three times as much thallium, a toxic heavy metal.[14] Other sources report finding insect eggs, dead flies, mold, and human feces in counterfeit cigarettes.[15] During prohibition of alcohol in the United States during the 1920s, increased enforcement did not manage to significantly decrease the prevalence of bootlegging because the… [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 5:17 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
Yes, Rosenberg, et al. have a point when they say America was slow to extend the franchise to the African population. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 2:22 pm
As a matter of full disclosure, Joondeph also served as a consultant for the State and Local Legal Center in the preparation of its amicus brief for the Government Finance Officers of America et al. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
DeCoste, Caesar's Faith: Limited Government and Freedom of Religion in Bruker v. [read post]
With the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit having struck down Rule 14a-11 in Business Roundtable et al v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm by Law Lady
VERONICA BONCROFT and SCOTT RUBINCHIK, Appellees. 4th District.Arbitration -- Trial court erred in denying motion to dismiss and to compel arbitration on ground that there are five other cases between the parties in the same probate division, where this case is based on an operating agreement containing an arbitration clause, and the other five cases are notBARRY BERK, et al., Appellants, vs. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
To take the best-known precedent, after World War II the United States prosecuted German government lawyers in the second round of Nuremberg trials. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 10:17 am by William Ford
” In preparation for oral arguments in United States v. [read post]