Search for: "Selective Insurance Company v. Goings" Results 41 - 60 of 518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2010, 3:37 am by Chip Merlin
Even in jury trials, the itemization of jury verdicts is far shorter than what the insurance companies are having their attorneys ask for in front of judges.A decision yesterday by Florida's Third District Court of Appeal, Pineda v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:55 am by Mike Scarcella
Four banks—Bank of America Corporation, Wells Fargo & Company, Citigroup, Inc. and PNC Financial Services—would each receive about $150 million from the compensation fund payment to invest, the plaintiffs’ lawyers in Keepseagle v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 7:53 am
Doctors, hospitals, insurance companies and their attorneys have all of the resources necessary to mount a vigorous defense. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:55 am
The police report further indicated that Piontkowski was going to re-interview plaintiff and then forward the matter to the New York State Insurance Frauds Bureau. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 1:11 am
This story from National Underwriter about the Fifth Circuit's Leonard v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:12 am by Paul T. Moura
Selection of Arbitrators The arbitration clause in a typical Bermuda Form gives little direction about the considerations that go into the all-important process of selecting arbitrators. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 10:16 am
On 17 July in Equitas Limited v Allstate Insurance Company [2008] EWHC 1671 Mr Justice Beatson handed down his decision on whether Allstate was entitled to a stay of the instant proceedings initiated by Equitas in March 2008.Equitas's action (the English Proceedings), which Allstate sought to stay, concerned the scope of a commutation agreement between Equitas and Allstate; Allstate had reinsured certain Lloyd's syndicates. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 7:03 am
  Now comes a new opinion of the Second Circuit, reinstating an insurer's forum selection and giving a strong boost to the "first filed" rule. [read post]
Given the significant reputational harm that can go along with losing wage and hour claims, control over the selection of counsel should not be overlooked. 3. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:34 am by Bob Kelley
Last week the Fourth District Court of Appeal reinstated a $4.9 million dollar jury verdict against State Farm Insurance Company in a UM case that had been set aside by the trial judge on the grounds of “juror non-disclosure” about the juror’s prior litigation history. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
 In the meantime, Chief Justice Castille and the Supreme Court are going out with a bang with the Chief Justice’s important opinions issued in November in the case of Tincher v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
 In the meantime, Chief Justice Castille and the Supreme Court are going out with a bang with the Chief Justice’s important opinions issued in November in the case of Tincher v. [read post]