Search for: "Sellers v. District of Columbia" Results 41 - 60 of 142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2010, 7:37 am
The stay was granted by US District Court for the District of Columbia Judge Emmet Sullivan, as was an extension, but now the stay expires on April 21, 2010, and a status report on how the negotiations are proceeding is due on April 15, 2010.Lead counsel for the plaintiffs, Joseph Sellers, of Washington's Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, believes the two parties are not close to reaching a settlement. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:34 am
Without more from the Rules or courts, Maryland attorneys, especially those also licensed in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, should consider implementing practical guidance from two D.C. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 5:58 am by Timothy P. Flynn
The last time the high-court considered the merits of a Second Amendment right to bear arms case was back in 2010.SCOTUS set the current table relative to the right to bear arms in its 2008 District of Columbia v Heller decision. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:02 pm by Series of Essays
Brnovich and Its Implications September 20, 2021 | Joshua Sellers, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law The Supreme Court’s decision in Brnovich v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 1:09 pm by Kate Howard
District of Columbia 16-460 Issue: Whether the tolling provision in 28 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Hodge, arising in the District of Columbia, the Chief Justice similarly noted that the petitioners James and Mary Hurd were "found by the trial court to be Negroes," even though James Hurd had maintained that he was "not a Negro, but a Mohawk Indian. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm by Mark Walsh
” He noted that 41 states, two U.S. territories, and the District of Columbia had joined an amicus brief on South Dakota’s side asking the court to reject the Quill test. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:28 pm by Amy Howe
District of Columbia – Wednesday, November 1: The interpretation of the federal law that allows (but does not require) federal courts to consider state-law claims related to the plaintiff’s federal claims, putting the statute of limitations for the state-law claims on hold while the case is pending in federal court. [read post]