Search for: "Sellers v. Head"
Results 41 - 60
of 395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
Firstly, the heads of loss within the clause: all actions, proceedings, losses, claims, damages, costs, charges, expenses and liabilities suffered or incurred, and all fines, compensation or remedial action or payments imposed on or required to be made by the Company Secondly, the qualifying conditions within the clause: A. following and arising out of claims or complaints registered with the FSA, the Financial Services Ombudsman or any other Authority against the Company, the… [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
Unless it's convenient to do so, and then they do.And, in the right situation, physicians are not sellers but buyers -- "purchasers" of the products they prescribe to their patients.It's enough to make your head spin.Or at least to make you ponder the meaning of the phrase "situational ethics. [read post]
On Delfi v Estonia… Is it time to adopt a good-Samaritan style exemption? – Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon
23 Jun 2015, 4:56 pm
On 24 January 2006 the applicant company published an article on the Delfi portal under the heading “SLK Destroyed Planned Ice Road”. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 7:29 am
Div case, Pappas v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 6:57 am
In order to alleviate some of these risks, potential buyers need to address these considerations head-on during the due diligence and negotiation process. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 10:57 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
Sanofi Adventis v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 2:08 pm
” In Blue Mountain Enterprises, LLC v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 7:29 am
Cite to IC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 4:06 pm
The Impact Fund founder is perhaps best known for Dukes v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 11:02 am
Sunfrog * Online Marketplace Defeats Trademark Suit Because It’s Not the “Seller”–OSU v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 6:39 am
After several hours, they headed back home. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 9:07 am
The Bolger Decision The impetus for this blog post is last month’s ruling Bolger v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 10:10 am
Reutzel v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
In Kellogg Co. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 5:13 am
App. 1990), and Gasque v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:41 am
Last week, the Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio issued its opinion in Chesapeake v. [read post]
17 May 2014, 1:14 pm
You have to admit you made a bone-head error. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 6:22 am
The Board found that there was no likelihood of confusion, and remitted the case to the Opposition Division.CopyrightNedim Malovic alerted readers to a recently-initiated case in Sweden that will apply the so-called 'best seller' provision from Article 20 DSM Directive. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 5:24 pm
The seller files a statement of defence and argues that the claim is time barred. [read post]
