Search for: "Serco" Results 41 - 60 of 93
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2013, 10:26 am by Charon QC
 G4S, Serco, Tesco, Stobart et al – if Grayling’s plans go through  - will probably kill off the high street solicitor specialising in Crime, reduce the pool of lawyers available to the public (You won’t be able to choose your solicitor anyway and the criminal bar will be significantly reduced in number) and….. well let me leave the detail to two experienced barristers who express their views robustly in recent podcasts with me. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am by Charon QC
 G4S, Serco, Tesco, Stobart et al – if Grayling’s plans go through  - will probably kill off the high street solicitor specialising in Crime, reduce the pool of lawyers available to the public (You won’t be able to choose your solicitor anyway and the criminal bar will be significantly reduced in number) and….. well let me leave the detail to two experienced barristers who express their views robustly in recent podcasts with me. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 6:09 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Serco, Inc., two of the most employer friendly wage and hour decisions in recent memory, distinguished this case from the Seventh Circuit’s decisions in Ross v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:25 am by tracey
Serco, a leading private contractor of public services, is failing to meet legal requirements to provide enough staff, train them properly or monitor their performance in the out-of-hours GP service it runs for the NHS in Cornwall.” Full story Daily Telegraph, 18th July 2012 Source: www.guardian.co.uk [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:29 am by tracey
(Rev 3) [2012] EWCA Crim 1456 (04 July 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Secretary of State for Home Department v AM [2012] EWHC 1854 (Admin) (06 July 2012) The College of Naturopathic Medicine Ltd (CNM), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 1) [2012] EWHC 1851 (Admin) (05 July 2012) FGP v Serco Plc & Anor [2012] EWHC 1804 (Admin) (05 July 2012) High Court (Commercial Court) Sibir Energy Ltd v Tchigirinski & Ors [2012] EWHC 1844 (Comm)… [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:19 am by Charon QC
This time it’s Serco, fingered by the Guardian (EXCLUSIVELY!) [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 In July 2009, though not yet in business, Jaxon obtained contracts from Serco, one of L3’s major clients, allegedly as a result of collusion that prevented L3 from bidding meaningfully. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:44 am by sally
“After all the furore over the proposed radical extension of the role of the private sector in policing, what should we make of G4S and Serco advertising to recruit probation officers? [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:43 am by sally
Supreme Court Tesco Stores Ltd v Dundee City Council (Scotland) [2012] UKSC 13 (21 March 2012) ST Eritrea, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 12 (21 March 2012) Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd [2012] UKSC 11 (21 March 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Mohamed v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 331 (20 March 2012) Kennedy v Charity Commission [2012] EWCA Civ 317 (20 March 2012) Hutchinson & Anor v Neale & Anor… [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:22 am by Michael Scutt
The leading case on the subject for several years has been Lawson v Serco and, in particular, Lord Hoffmann’s Judgment on the question  “what connection between Great Britain and the employment relationship is required to make section 94(1) the appropriate choice of law in deciding whether and in what circumstances an employee can complain that his dismissal was unfair? [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 1:45 am by Christopher Knight, 11 KBW.
Ever since the judgment of Lord Hoffmann in Lawson v Serco Ltd [2006] UKHL 3; [2006] ICR 250, the territorial scope of the protection from unfair dismissal contained in the Employment Rights Act 1996, s 94(1) has been a matter of some debate. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:50 am by Rosalind English
In Lawson v Serco Ltd [2006] UKHL 3, Lord Hoffmann identified three categories of employees who would fall within the jurisdiction of the employment tribunal: employees working in Great Britain; peripatetic employees where the employee is ‘based’ in Great Britain; and, in some exceptional cases, expatriate employees [9-12]. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:24 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In the light of Lawson v Serco [2006] UKHL 3, the Court considered whether an employment tribunal had jurisdiction in relation to individuals resident in Great Britain and employed by a British company, but who travelled to and from home to work overseas. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am by Rosalind English
The Children’s Rights Alliance for England (CRAE) v Secretary of State for Justice and G4S Care and Justice Services (UK) Ltd  and Serco plc [2012] EWHC 8 (Admin) – read judgment Although certain restraining measures had been taken unlawfully against young people in secure training centres for a number of years, the court had no jurisdiction to grant an order that the victims of this activity be identified and advised of their rights. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 4:02 am by Libby Payne, Olswang LLP
Current state of the law The House of Lords decision in Lawson v Serco Ltd [2006] ICR 250 is the leading case in this area. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:10 am by Laura Sandwell
The issue for the Supreme Court is what the correct test is for determining whether an ET has jurisdiction to hear an unfair dismissal claim brought by a person who works abroad for a UK company in light of Lawson v Serco [2006] UKHL 3. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 5:17 pm by Will Aitchison
Serco, Inc., 530 F.3d 1224, 1230-31 (10th Cir.2008); Valerio v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 10:58 am by SOIssues
The current eight-year contracts, which are held by G4S and Serco electronic monitoring services, are due to end shortly. [read post]