Search for: "Service Employees v. Foundation"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2023, 7:01 am
Volokh v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm
Treasury, IRS, the Department of Labor, Health and Human Services, and the Office of Personnel Management, issue FAQs regarding implementation of certain provisions of Title I (the No Surprises Act) of Division BB of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, in light of the August 24, 2023, decision in Texas Medical Association v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
A grand jury charged Rogers with obstruction in a kickback scheme involving public money from the Jefferson County Community Service fund, a collection of tax dollars that local lawmakers get to dole out to local causes. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 7:26 am
That is the necessary implication of Rumsfeld v. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Rethinking the political speech of public sector employees may help us rethink the relationships between objectivity, expertise, and democratic governance, and thus the normative foundations of the modern state itself. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
In Buckley v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Difederico is a consumer, the nature of her claims “have a commercial foundation”. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 11:25 am
From the prices we pay for food, travel, financial services, payments to the way we interact daily using digital apps and platforms, antitrust touches each and every one of us in ways we may not even realize. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Microsoft (personal computer and server software; tablets and other hardware; games and gaming devices; cloud services) was frequently mentioned, as well. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 8:06 am
See Parts I, II, III, IV, and V. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The constitutional foundations of judicial review. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Wash.) in Diemert v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 10:11 am
These rules define the process for out-of-network providers, facilities, and providers of air ambulance services, and group health plans, health insurance issuers in the individual and group markets, and Federal Employee Health Benefits (“FEHB”) carriers (“disputing parties”) to determine the out-of-network rate for out-of-network emergency services and certain items and services provided by out-of-network providers at in-network facilities… [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:55 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a judgment and order in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am
Potential amendments to the law would allow the Home Office to bypass end-to-end encryption employed by Apple messaging services. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
These U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:22 pm
That lawsuit, Boudreaux v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Of course, there are various defenses that employers, insurance carriers, and their servicing agents may raise to contest an employee’s right to recover benefits, such as untimely notice of an injury, misrepresentation, and even fraud. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
It defines Scope 3 emissions as “indirect upstream and downstream greenhouse gas emissions, other than scope 2 emissions, from sources that the reporting entity does not own or directly control and may include, but are not limited to, purchased goods and services, business travel, employee commutes, and processing and use of sold products. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
Out-of-state employers, insurers, employee benefit plan vendors, and other businesses registered to do business in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, or another state that requires that out-of-state businesses consent to jurisdiction as a condition of their registration to do business in the state face a heightened risk of getting hauled into court in the consent to jurisdiction state following last month’s Supreme Court decision in Mallory v. [read post]
