Search for: "Sharpe v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2022, 12:25 am
Rock Island R.R. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 10:16 pm
216 Jamaica Avenue, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 10:11 am
Photo credit: KellyNelson/Shutterstock.com Read United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 1:25 pm
My latest column for Forbes.com, "United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 10:08 am
An interesting D.C. federal district court decision from last Fall that I just ran across, in Sharp Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 11:07 pm
Sharpe, [read post]
4 Sep 2016, 8:11 am
Edens v. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 9:07 am
The IPKat has had his attention directed to the decision in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Teva UK Ltd, [2011] EWCA Civ 382, a ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Sir Andrew Morrit, The Chancellor of the High Court, providing a judgment with which Richards and Patten LJJ agreed) handed down yesterday.To summarise: Teva had applied for revocation of Merck’s European Patent (EP(UK) 0509752), relating to “ophthalmic compositions comprising combinations of… [read post]
16 May 2007, 10:33 pm
Sharpe and Brown v. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
War is the means by which nation states have sometimes resolved their differences. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 10:11 am
Photo credit: KellyNelson/Shutterstock.com Read United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 11:07 am
In Perez v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 8:56 am
The Supreme Court’s cert grant last June in Moore v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 11:30 am
SCOTUSblog has listed Sharp v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:01 am
The Solicitor General has filed the federal government's Brief in Opposition in Sharp v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 7:49 am
In Sharp v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 6:37 am
Decision in Davis v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 3:55 am
Two days ago, I began describing a forthcoming paper of mine offering a new take on Windsor v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
Lady Justice Sharp proceeded to state, at [19] that, when the Court of Appeal comes to consider meaning: “The issue is not whether we would have come to the same or a different conclusion had we been trying the case at first instance. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:31 pm
Miss.) in Favre v. [read post]
