Search for: "Shepard v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 186
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2018, 6:25 am
See United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 9:53 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 1:17 pm
("United"), the company for whom Adem drove the cab. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:22 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:35 pm
Shepard v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 10:42 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 1:32 pm
.'"Please Shepardize United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:43 pm
See Shepard v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 3:31 pm
United States, 325 U. [read post]
3 May 2007, 2:34 pm
When United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:16 pm
Charles Coble at the Newsroom Law Blog comments on the United States Supreme Court's decision to deny certiorari in Salzano v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 9:42 am
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 2:31 pm
United States, 495 U.S. 575 (1990) and Shepard v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:21 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm
The Court, explicitly recognizing the relationship between suggestiveness and mistakes in identification has repeatedly expressed concern that police arranged identification procedures may alter a witness’s memory rendering the subsequent identification testimony unreliable (United States v Wade, 388 US 218 [1967], Stovall v Denno, 388 US 293 [1967]; Simmons v United States, 390 US 377 [1968]; Manson v Braithwaite,… [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:39 am
In Quill Corporation v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:39 am
In Quill Corporation v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 7:17 pm
Google, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 15-15809 D.C. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 8:10 am
So we were pleased when, several years after Rimbert, a federal MDL judge rejected that conclusion and opined that New Mexico did indeed follow the learned intermediary rule along with all but one other United States jurisdiction. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
United States, 12-6355, concerning the proper application of the categorical analysis in Shepard v. [read post]